<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intuitive Design (web navigation concepts)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/design/intuitive-design-web-navigation-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/design/intuitive-design-web-navigation-concepts/</link>
	<description>branding has a new voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:36:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jschilling</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/design/intuitive-design-web-navigation-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-31326</link>
		<dc:creator>jschilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.six-degrees.com/blog/?p=55#comment-31326</guid>
		<description>This is a very direct type of communication. Not that I&#039;m completely against it, however at times it is not always a requirement. The use of semantic creativity can and will always bring a personal touch to such longstanding—and at times—stale conventions. Of course it would also be important that there is no competing &quot;sharing&quot; elements on the site. If there were, (your point taken) it would very likely confuse users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very direct type of communication. Not that I&#8217;m completely against it, however at times it is not always a requirement. The use of semantic creativity can and will always bring a personal touch to such longstanding—and at times—stale conventions. Of course it would also be important that there is no competing &#8220;sharing&#8221; elements on the site. If there were, (your point taken) it would very likely confuse users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitesh</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/design/intuitive-design-web-navigation-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-31202</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.six-degrees.com/blog/?p=55#comment-31202</guid>
		<description>I think, we should be following the acceptable trend of web navigation we are accustomed to. If you are supposed to upload a file, &quot;Upload file&quot; would be more effective than &quot;Share file&quot; because &quot;Share File&quot; would be confusing in many scenarios. Trying to be different than what is the trend around may not have a good impression on the visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, we should be following the acceptable trend of web navigation we are accustomed to. If you are supposed to upload a file, &#8220;Upload file&#8221; would be more effective than &#8220;Share file&#8221; because &#8220;Share File&#8221; would be confusing in many scenarios. Trying to be different than what is the trend around may not have a good impression on the visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

