<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Brand Stands Alone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/</link>
	<description>branding has a new voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:41:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>I agree with M. Gauzens. I have no problem separating Branson from Virgin. With Trump, it&#039;s a different story. Of course, as noted above, Trump has the next generation already lined up, paving the way for the brand to move on without him.

My feeling is that brands can move on once the founders have left. But it&#039;s not by chance; it&#039;s deliberate. Performance and total commitment paves the way.

The most successful brands are built to be sustainable. That&#039;s a big part of the value of branding in the first place. You build a brand not for the short-term rewards. You build a brand for results over the long-term.

To be sustainable, the brand must stay true to its essence, to the values and ideals it stands for. Jordan doesn&#039;t play basketball anymore, but the Jordan Nike brand is as strong as ever. Jordan still stands for Jordan... and Nike&#039;s brought other stars on board to complement the branding effort.

This is not exactly the same thing as brand personification, but what about all of the corporations out there who have put their CEO front and center and larger than life. In some cases, they almost become synonymous with the brand. Look at GE and Jack Welch. His successor Jeff Immelt may not have gained the same level of popularity, but the GE brand has fared well since Welch&#039;s departure.

This is a great topic. I&#039;ll be digging into this one further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with M. Gauzens. I have no problem separating Branson from Virgin. With Trump, it&#8217;s a different story. Of course, as noted above, Trump has the next generation already lined up, paving the way for the brand to move on without him.</p>
<p>My feeling is that brands can move on once the founders have left. But it&#8217;s not by chance; it&#8217;s deliberate. Performance and total commitment paves the way.</p>
<p>The most successful brands are built to be sustainable. That&#8217;s a big part of the value of branding in the first place. You build a brand not for the short-term rewards. You build a brand for results over the long-term.</p>
<p>To be sustainable, the brand must stay true to its essence, to the values and ideals it stands for. Jordan doesn&#8217;t play basketball anymore, but the Jordan Nike brand is as strong as ever. Jordan still stands for Jordan&#8230; and Nike&#8217;s brought other stars on board to complement the branding effort.</p>
<p>This is not exactly the same thing as brand personification, but what about all of the corporations out there who have put their CEO front and center and larger than life. In some cases, they almost become synonymous with the brand. Look at GE and Jack Welch. His successor Jeff Immelt may not have gained the same level of popularity, but the GE brand has fared well since Welch&#8217;s departure.</p>
<p>This is a great topic. I&#8217;ll be digging into this one further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Gauzens</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-4367</link>
		<dc:creator>M Gauzens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-4367</guid>
		<description>I would describe Richard Branson as one of the more flamboyant business leaders - though it is interesting because I feel like it is much easier to seperate him from Virgin than it is to seperate Trump from his companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would describe Richard Branson as one of the more flamboyant business leaders &#8211; though it is interesting because I feel like it is much easier to seperate him from Virgin than it is to seperate Trump from his companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas_Munk</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-9280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas_Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-9280</guid>
		<description>@sensorybranding In the early stages it can be powerful to use a &quot;founder&quot; as it creates brand trust, personality and differentiation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sensorybranding In the early stages it can be powerful to use a &#8220;founder&#8221; as it creates brand trust, personality and differentiation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas_Munk</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-9279</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas_Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-9279</guid>
		<description>@sensorybranding History tells the facts - just watch Coca Cola - but also Starbucks (which got into trouble after Schultz left!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sensorybranding History tells the facts &#8211; just watch Coca Cola &#8211; but also Starbucks (which got into trouble after Schultz left!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas_Munk</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-9278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas_Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-9278</guid>
		<description>@sensorybranding yet, before its &quot;too late&quot; (if he fx dies) - and rather have the future CEOs work as custodians of the brand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sensorybranding yet, before its &#8220;too late&#8221; (if he fx dies) &#8211; and rather have the future CEOs work as custodians of the brand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas_Munk</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-9277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas_Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-9277</guid>
		<description>@sensorybranding shows that companies really have to be carefull with this! - I would recommend the company at some point to remove focus..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sensorybranding shows that companies really have to be carefull with this! &#8211; I would recommend the company at some point to remove focus..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas_Munk</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-9276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas_Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-9276</guid>
		<description>@sensorybranding As we could see stocks going down when Jobs were reported I&#039;ll, and they thereafter kept the lever transplant a secret..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sensorybranding As we could see stocks going down when Jobs were reported I&#8217;ll, and they thereafter kept the lever transplant a secret..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-4132</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-4132</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a problem with there are many brand or companies that run on this sort of postioning. As long as you have a clear an strong business plan on how and when to leverage it you should be cool! Great question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a problem with there are many brand or companies that run on this sort of postioning. As long as you have a clear an strong business plan on how and when to leverage it you should be cool! Great question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sensorybranding</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-9275</link>
		<dc:creator>sensorybranding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-9275</guid>
		<description>Bands based upon a personality: Good idea? or not? Curious? So are we. http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/br... - JDM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bands based upon a personality: Good idea? or not? Curious? So are we. <a href="http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/br.." rel="nofollow">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/br..</a>. &#8211; JDM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellemnopee</title>
		<link>http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/brand-profitability/the-brand-stands-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>ellemnopee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconventionalbranding.com/?p=523#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>Building around a personality limits your flexibility as a brand as cultural norms shift and certain ideals become less popular.  A great example of this is the economic crash of 08/09.  Almost overnight we went from living beyond our means to focusing closer to home.  This shifted advertising campaigns set to hit during Q4 of 08.  Saving was way more important than fulfilling dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building around a personality limits your flexibility as a brand as cultural norms shift and certain ideals become less popular.  A great example of this is the economic crash of 08/09.  Almost overnight we went from living beyond our means to focusing closer to home.  This shifted advertising campaigns set to hit during Q4 of 08.  Saving was way more important than fulfilling dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
